E-ISSN: 1309-0380
    The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Original Investigation
    VOLUME: 12 ISSUE: 2
    P: 97-103
    June 2011

    The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience

    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2011;12(2):97-103
    DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.23
    A. Kubilay Ertan 1
    Michael Ulbricht 1
    Kirsten Huebner 1
    Alexander Di Liberto 2
    1. Department Of Gynaecology And Obstetrics, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Germany
    2. Department Of Obstetrics And Gynecology, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Leverkusen, Germany
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 16.05.2011
    Accepted Date: 21.05.2011
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Objective:

    Robotic assisted surgery is an advancement on conventional laparoscopy. The first and single FDA-approved device is the daVinci™ system, which provides means to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopy. In Germany the use of the robotic system in gynaecology is at the threshold of a promising development. There is a wide spectrum of indications, such as simple and radical hysterectomies, including pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection. The introduction of the robotic system into the clinical routine is demonstrated.

    Material and Methods:

    Robotic assisted laparoscopic interventions have been performed in the reporting hospital since April 2008. In the course of treatment of 172 cases, an increasing rise of complexity of surgical procedure has been achieved. The daVinci™ system is well adaptable in clinical routine. Hitherto, the clinical outcome has been favourable, higher-grade specific complications occurred very rarely. The short time advantages are a decrease of postoperative length of stay, a reduction of postinterventional need of analgetics and an overall accelerated period of recovery has been demonstrated compared to conventional abdominal procedures. It also shows that a drastic decrease of open conventional abdominal procedures concerning uterine pathologies appeared in the reporting department.

    Results:

    Perioperative advantages of robotic assisted laparoscopic interventions are, above all, the decrease of morbidity (concerning blood loss, need of analgetics, length of stay, etc.). Surgical advantages are the more complex applicability, improved precision, dexterity and vision (3D), a greater autonomy of the surgeon, a smaller learning curve and an increase of preparation consistent with the anatomical structures. In contrast, disadvantages concern an initial greater time investment, the potentially different management of complications, the limited applicability in multiquadrant surgery and the difficulty regarding cost coverage respective to recovery.

    Conclusions:

    In conclusion, robotic assisted minimal invasive surgery has an enormous potential in gynaecology; by simplifying the essential surgical procedure. The advantages of this technique will be approachability for a majority of gynaecological patients. The feasibility of a multitude of gynaecological surgical interventions has already been approved partially in a small number of cases. The upcoming challenge now is to verify the short and long term advantages of robotic surgery in prospective trials, especially concerning gynaecological oncology.

    Keywords: Robotic surgery, gynaecology, daVinci technique, oncological gynaecology

    References

    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House