No birth sex ratio difference between Mexican and non-Mexican births in Mexico
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Letter to the Editor
    P: 225-225
    September 2023

    No birth sex ratio difference between Mexican and non-Mexican births in Mexico

    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2023;24(3):225-225
    1. Department of Pediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 06.04.2023
    Accepted Date: 25.05.2023
    Publish Date: 07.09.2023
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    To the Editor,

    The sex ratio at birth is expected to be approximately 0.515, calculated as male births divided by total births (M/T), thus a slight excess of males. Acute stress in the general population may cause M/T depressions, as evidenced by the M/T dip observed after the Great Recession of 2007 in the United States (#*#ref1#*#). Significant racial differences have been noted and attributed to innate and minor physiological differences, but chronic stress has been proposed as a possible cause (#*#ref2#*#). A recent paper showed that M/T was depressed in Mexico when compared to a global reference dataset (#*#ref3#*#,#*#ref4#*#). This study was carried out in order to ascertain whether Mexican M/T was similar to M/T in non-Mexican births in the same study cohort (#*#ref4#*#).

    Ethical approval was not required as data was comprised of free and anonymous datasets from the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía, Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography. For the same reason, informed consent was not obtained. Live births by sex, year and nationality [Mexican or non-Mexican (“Extranjero”)] were available for the period January 2010-December 2020.

    The equations of Fleiss (binomial) were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions. A bespoke Excel sheet was used to perform chi square tests. A p-value <0.05 was taken to represent a statistically significant result. Mexican and non-Mexican births by sex, and M/T with 95% CIs are shown in Table 1. There was no significant M/T difference between the two groups.

    Table 1

    While racial disparities in M/T could theoretically be caused by innate physiological differences, it is also possible that the differences seen may be due to chronic stress (#*#ref2#*#). Support for this comes from a comparison of racial M/T in the United States which showed that M/T was higher in Whites than in American Indian/Alaska Native, and Black/African American births (#*#ref5#*#). This was probably due to the fact that in the United States, race remains the primary determinant of socioeconomic status and stress. This accords with the Trivers-Willard hypothesis of male foetal loss in this type of stress (#*#ref2#*#).

    This study indirectly supports the hypothesis that innate physiological differences do not appear to affect M/T, as there were no significant differences between the low Mexican M/T and non-Mexican M/T. However, the study was limited by small numbers and a lack of breakdown of what races or ethnicities constituted the non-Mexican births.

    References

    1
    Grech V. The Great Recession of 2007 in the United States and the male: female ratio at birth. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2015; 16: 70-3.
    2
    Grech V. A socio-economic hypothesis for lower birth sex ratios at racial, national and global levels. Early Hum Dev 2018; 116: 81-3.
    3
    Grech V, Mamo J. What is the sex ratio at birth? Early Hum Dev 2020; 140: 104858.
    4
    Grech V. Regional differences in the sex ratio at birth in Mexico. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2023; 24: 1-4.
    5
    Grech V. Evidence of socio-economic stress and female foeticide in racial disparities in the gender ratio at birth in the United States (1995-2014). Early Hum Dev 2017; 106-107: 63-5.
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House